<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mary Robinette Kowal &#187; etiquette</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/tag/etiquette/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com</link>
	<description>The daily journal of a puppeteer and SF writer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Getting introduced to someone else&#8217;s agent</title>
		<link>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/getting-introduced-to-someone-elses-agent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/getting-introduced-to-someone-elses-agent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Robinette Kowal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Scholes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/?p=2213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jennifer Jackson is answering questions about agenting, on her LJ. And today she was talking about the role of net-working and conferences. It&#8217;s worth reading, but she basically says that all the net-working in the world won&#8217;t make a difference if the book isn&#8217;t good. Then she says: On the other hand, Elizabeth Bear introduced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer Jackson is answering questions about agenting, on her LJ.  And today she was talking about <a href="http://arcaedia.livejournal.com/151737.html?view=1806265">the role of net-working and conferences.</a>  It&#8217;s worth reading, but she basically says that all the net-working in the world won&#8217;t make a difference if the book isn&#8217;t good.  Then she says:</p>
<blockquote><p>
On the other hand, <a href="http://www.elizabethbear.com/">Elizabeth Bear</a> introduced me to <a href="http://www.jlake.com/">Jay Lake</a>, who in turn set up a meeting with <a href="http://www.kenscholes.com/">Ken Scholes</a>, and he recommended Mary Robinette Kowal, who became a new client of mine last month. (That makes it Mary&#8217;s turn&#8230;.) So, it certainly has its advantages. They still all had to write really, really, really, really ridiculously good books.</p></blockquote>
<p>Which set me thinking&#8230;  See, the thing is, that Ken&#8217;s introduction let me jump the slush pile. BUT if I&#8217;d sent in my first novel, Jennifer would have rejected me.  The novel I signed with is the fourth that I&#8217;ve written.</p>
<p>The evolution goes like this:</p>
<ul>
<li>Novel 0: Took ten years, starting from high school, to write.  It is well and firmly trunked. (Shape-shifting cat/human aliens with wings anyone?  Did I mention my D&#038;D character has the same name?  Yeah&#8230; trunk.  TRUNK.)</li>
<li><strong>Novel 1</strong>: Middle-grade Fantasy &#8211; Six months.  I think this has potential, but there&#8217;s a flaw in the first three chapters that I can&#8217;t seem to fix. I sent this out to publishers on my own for a while, and always got requests for partials but no requests for fulls.  Now.  This is book one in a series.  Did I write the second book in the series next?  No.</li>
<li><strong>Novel 2:</strong> Science Fiction/Murder Mystery &#8211; Four months.  Better.  It needed revisions, so I set it aside to think about before diving into it.  Meanwhile, I wrote:</li>
<li><strong>Novel 3:</strong> Urban Fantasy/Chick Lit &#8211;  Three months.  Good.  Needs revisions&#8230; Meanwhile:</li>
<li><strong>Novel 4: </strong> Regency romance/Fantasy &#8211; Three months.  Good!  This immediately felt stronger than the others and I had a clear view of what changes needed to happen.  So I didn&#8217;t wait on the revisions. This is the one I signed with.</li>
</ul>
<p>The point being, that it took a while for me to learn to write something salable and that if I&#8217;d sent in any of the others, I think I would still be without an agent because those books aren&#8217;t there yet.  I do think they can be, but the course I chose to take &#8212; and mileage varies &#8212; was to write novels in several different genres to see which one stuck.  I have sequel ideas for all of them, but until I knew that I had a book one that worked, it didn&#8217;t make sense to invest time in a string of books in the same world.</p>
<p>At the moment, I&#8217;m doing revisions on Novel 2 and continuing to work on short stories.  Right now, I&#8217;m at a point in my career where I have the luxury of taking a year off from a novel before doing revisions.  Since I&#8217;m a better writer now than I was a year ago, waiting to revise the novels is like earning interest on my skills.  Seriously.  I re-read Novel 2 and it was dead easy to see where it had gone astray.  The revision process is like swimming downstream.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s say that Ken offered to introduce me before I&#8217;d written Novel 4.  I knew Novel 1 was flawed, so sending it in would have been wasting that opportunity.  What&#8217;s more, it would have been embarrassing to Ken.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that someday I&#8217;ll introduce a writer to Jennifer, but I can almost guarantee that it won&#8217;t be with their first novel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/getting-introduced-to-someone-elses-agent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Jolly Book of Fun Craft</title>
		<link>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/the-jolly-book-of-fun-craft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/the-jolly-book-of-fun-craft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 20:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Robinette Kowal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading Aloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[makes me laugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/the-jolly-book-of-fun-craft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I collect etiquette books, so if you ever need to know what kind of gloves to wear to an afternoon wedding in 1851 or the proper way to say goodbye to a guest in 1907, come to me. One of the prizes in my collection is The Jolly Book of Funcraft by Patten Beard in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/?pp_album=main&amp;pp_cat=&amp;pp_image=faggotfunparty.jpg" title="Faggot Fun Party"><img src="http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/wp-content/photos/faggotfunparty.jpg" alt="Faggot Fun Party" width="207" height="300" class="alignright" /></a>I collect etiquette books, so if you ever need to know what kind of gloves to wear to an afternoon wedding in 1851 or the proper way to say goodbye to a guest in 1907, come to me.  One of the prizes in my collection is <em>The Jolly Book of Funcraft</em> by Patten Beard in 1918.  It is a book of ideas for parties and the table of contents includes such things as:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Party Made From Almost Nothing At All</li>
<li>The Thanksgiving Fun Making</li>
<li>Carrot Fun</li>
<li>A Plasticine Party</li>
<li>The Faggot Party</li>
</ul>
<p>Oh yes, my dears.  What could be more fun, than a Faggot Fun Party.</p>
<p>[audio:faggotfunparty.mp3]</p>
<p>The thing that makes me laugh most, is the stunning poem at the end and the way it shows just exactly how much words have changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/the-jolly-book-of-fun-craft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Habits of Good Society &#8211; 1859</title>
		<link>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/the-habits-of-good-society-1859/</link>
		<comments>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/the-habits-of-good-society-1859/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Robinette Kowal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was well said by a late eminent barrister, that literature in ladies should be what onions ought to be in cookery; you should perceive the flavour, but not detect the thing itself. Excerpt from The Habits of Good Society Anonymous, 1859]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It was well said by a late eminent barrister, that literature in ladies should be what onions ought to be in cookery; you should perceive the flavour, but not detect the thing itself.</p>
<p>Excerpt from <em>The Habits of Good Society</em><br />
Anonymous, 1859</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/the-habits-of-good-society-1859/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Practical Etiquette for the Modern Man &#8211; 1964</title>
		<link>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/practical-etiquette-for-the-modern-man-1964/</link>
		<comments>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/practical-etiquette-for-the-modern-man-1964/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Robinette Kowal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/practical-etiquette-for-the-modern-man-1964/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I collect etiquette books and ran across this little gem recently. What is one of the most common errors people make when speaking to a writer? The woman who goes up to a writer at a cocktail party and tells him how she has always wanted to write but just hasn&#8217;t had the time, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I collect etiquette books and ran across this little gem recently.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>What is one of the most common errors people make when speaking to a writer?</em></p>
<p>The woman who goes up to a writer at a cocktail party and tells him how she has always wanted to write but just hasn&#8217;t had the time, as though it were as simple as making a hairdresser appointment. . . . Also the person who asks, &#8220;Is it true that everyone has a book in him?&#8221;  Normally the writer is polite and mutters something nice and then must stand on one foot and then another with a hot martini and soggy onion listening to her life story.</p>
<p>&#8211;Excerpt from <em>Practical Etiquette for the Modern Man</em><br />
Mary Lou Munson, 1964</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/practical-etiquette-for-the-modern-man-1964/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
