SF Signal: MIND MELD: SF with an Opposing Viewpoint

If you are curious, I’m one of the folks who answered SF Signal’s MIND MELD this week.

This week’s Mind Meld was influenced by a post on Lou Anders’ blog entitled Science Fiction Belongs to the World. In it, questions are raised about stories that espouse a viewpoint that is opposed to one(s) the reader holds.
Q: As a reader, can you enjoy a story that is pushing an opposed viewpoint from one that you hold (religion/politics)? If the author is prone to holding, and writing about, views opposed to yours, can you enjoy their works or do you stop reading them?

Did you know you can support Mary Robinette on Patreon?
Become a patron at Patreon!

2 thoughts on “SF Signal: MIND MELD: SF with an Opposing Viewpoint”

  1. Unless it’s a political tract, I generally enjoy reading even if it’s written by people who hold different viewpoints than I hold. I guess that my prime example is Heinlein, through his works I was led to other authors- I love his fiction, it’s what I grew up on, it gave me the sense of wonder that I hold about the future….but, I have triplets who have autism. If I lived in one of “his” universes, my kids would just be considered a burden, or valued for “talents” that they may or may not have- at the very least they sure wouldn’t get what they need from one of his “societies” (fortunately, I’m Canadian) I think that his favourite word for people with challenges like my kids have is “defective”. But I still love him, and re-read a lot of his things every 5 years or so.

    I find that it’s the same with a lot of science fiction that I read- when I mentally run over in my head my probable “top 10” authors, I probably disagree philosophically and politically with at least half of them.

    And to me, that’s one of the things that I love about reading. Whether it’s SF, non-fiction, mainstream, “Canadian”, history, poetry…whatever- I can always learn something new. And I’ve found that more often than not, when I read and enjoy an author’s stories, it most likely at least gives me a bit of extra empathy to understand a different point of view as well as introducing me to other authors who will most likely also stretch my mind in ways that it’s not accustomed to.

  2. I usually find myself interested in a different view point. I only ever read sf/fantasy, as I like to think it ‘escapist’ fiction. I have already suspended belief as soon as I cracked the book, and I really try and lose myself in the work. (one of the reasons short stories are tough for me, I tend to find them jarring when they end so quickly) So, if I can accept FTL or spells, then I have no problem accepting that I could be wrong about a political or social view. Of course, when the books finished, there is a patina of ‘fantasy’ over everything for a while, and I think, huh…. it would be weird if the world *really* worked like that. And then I get back to life.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top